Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
talk:settlements:kriegstein_territory [2015/10/13 23:51] hino |
talk:settlements:kriegstein_territory [2020/11/08 04:02] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
>What Kriegstein? You dissolved it. We have no agreements with a country that does not exist. --- //[[hinorashi@gmail.com|hino]] 2015/10/13 23:50// | >What Kriegstein? You dissolved it. We have no agreements with a country that does not exist. --- //[[hinorashi@gmail.com|hino]] 2015/10/13 23:50// | ||
+ | |||
+ | In that case, the annexation of Beardeaux, Eureka, and Nova Etrura, and of Nouvelle Reims and Castille is against server rules because upon the dissolution of the Kingdom of Kriegstein they dissolved into apolitical settlements, and such cannot be annexed. Nova Etrura, Nouvelle Reims and Castille are even still active.\\ | ||
+ | Either you play along in pretending that Kriegstein retains any relevance, or you play by the rules and leave its settlements alone.\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | t. political officer | ||
+ | |||
+ | >{{ :talk:settlements:kslfdjlksjfa.png |}} | ||
+ | >No problem here then. --- //[[hinorashi@gmail.com|hino]] 2015/10/14 00:03// | ||
+ | |||
+ | o-oh | ||
+ | I didn't hover over the image. Ok, nothing wrong here then, sorry. | ||
+ | t. political officer | ||
+ | |||
+ | This map is divisive and ignorant and violates the Breshikan Mandate of Kreigstein. Your people need to immediatly vacate all premises of the former Kingdom immediatly. -Shako the one and only | ||
+ | |||
+ | There is no Breshikan Mandate of Kriegstein because you didn't seek approval by the Reichsrat. t. Kaiser P_P_A I |