Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- talk:battles:rules_of_engagement [2014/01/31 23:56]
hino
+++ talk:battles:rules_of_engagement [2020/11/08 04:02] (current)
@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 >>By the way, why did you triple the length of a 10 day ban to 30 days for bringing light of this to the Politbüro?
 >>I would also like to add **you were [[http://goput.it/qf0k.png|never named but admitted to it]]** and **you were the one who messaged me about it on #int**. Take the libel claim and blow it our your ass. t. Duke Nukem --- //[[hinorashi@gmail.com|hino]] 2014/01/31 23:10//
+>>>No, you weren't banned for 10, but for 30 days for the griefing, some speedhacking and also this page and the chat logs - which back me up, obviously. I'm really thinking about extending it further, since you are ignorant and not willing to face facts (hence the wiki ban).
+>>>By the way, you're twisting facts again, as I already said that I knew about the TNT Palin placed in the furnace room. Considering that the TNT placement wasn't logged properly, it was just difficult since I also checked if it might have been dropped from a large height or something like this. My stupid TNT-related accusations can be attributed to my confusion, as I really expected this case to be obvious at first, with Palin having placed TNT. I didn't see the "unspecified action" (until you posted screenshots here) because there is basically no way to look it up and I didn't expect such a bug to happen. Then, I gave up and moved on to checking your damage, which got you banned in the end.
+>>>Of course I have nothing to fear because I did nothing wrong and already gave a pretty clear description of what happened. You're just hoping that you can make someone believe your lies, so even though I can prove the opposite and the Politbüro supports it, some people will keep believing it simply because "they heard of it". I'm just making sure this strategy will get you nowhere, so it can still remain in the page history for documentation purposes just like other offtopic or provocation.
+>>>Even your hint that I had admitted it is outrageous and just wrong. At first, I didn't feel that I had to comment on this, since all these accusations about "some mod abuse" obviously have nothing to do with any of my actions. On the other hand, it was still heavily implied by you, which is proven by the chat logs and indicated by Darynu's comment here.
+>>>In this case, it's rather a proof of you making things up just to fit your point of view, as there are no **facts** that could be used against me. By the way, somebody please copy her what I wrote here, as wiki bans unfortunately also affect reading rights. I did this because somebody that ignorant really doesn't deserve even more opportunities to spread lies. --- //Enton 2014/02/01 01:33//
+I guess you'll still try to use this against me, even though I made the things pretty clear.
 >By the way, there MIGHT BE a reason to be butthurt, since it's probably be more fun to play Minecraft instead of discussing this. Either way, blame yourself, not the person who dealt with this. It would have been much easier for me not to give a fuck at all, which is definitely the worse option.  --- //Enton 2014/01/31 14:51//