Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
decisions:injungivun [2013/04/04 06:03]
hino
decisions:injungivun [2020/11/08 04:02] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 =====NO MORE INDIAN GIVING===== =====NO MORE INDIAN GIVING=====
  
-<del>Buildings built in a Settlement should no longer be the regulation of a player, but the regulation of the settlement itself. A player cannot give a building to the betterment of a settlement and simply take it back, it makes no sense, under this logic a Player is entitled to every block he/she places. This makes it possible for a player to add something great to a settlement and then harm the settlements greatness by then taking it away if he or she so chooses. ​+Buildings built in a Settlement should no longer be the regulation of a player, but the regulation of the settlement itself. A player cannot give a building to the betterment of a settlement and simply take it back, it makes no sense, under this logic a Player is entitled to every block he/she places. This makes it possible for a player to add something great to a settlement and then harm the settlements greatness by then taking it away if he or she so chooses. ​
  
-I put forth that any Structure built to be part of or better a settlement belongs to the settlement upon completion and not to any individual player. This of course will vary from settlement to settlement, but it should be an overarching rule.</​del>​ //Who is John Galt?//+I put forth that any Structure built to be part of or better a settlement belongs to the settlement upon completion and not to any individual player. This of course will vary from settlement to settlement, but it should be an overarching rule.
  • decisions/injungivun.1365048188.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2020/11/08 04:00
  • (external edit)