Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- battles:grundescorp_vs_chris [2013/02/07 16:42]
shakomatic thats not how you do a date :----DDDD
+++ battles:grundescorp_vs_chris [2020/11/08 04:02] (current)
@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ^           //**Grundescorp vs Killer Chris**//           ^^
 | {{:battles:lawyered.jpg?300|}}||
-| Date | 2-7-2013 |
+| Date | 7 II 2013 |
 | Location| [[talk:settlements:al-iskandariya|Al-Iskandariya]] |
 | Result | Killer Chris banned for wasting [[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr's]] time|
 ^  Belligerents  ||
-| {{:orders:grundeswald_corp.png?22|}}[[orders:grundeswald|Grundescorp]]| {{http://i.imgur.com/ieyyjw8.png?22}}[[people:k_chris|Killer_Chris]] |
+| {{:orders:grundeswald_corp.png?22|}}[[orders_and_guilds:orders:grundeswald|Grundescorp]]| {{http://i.imgur.com/ieyyjw8.png?22}}[[people:k_chris|Killer_Chris]] |
 ^  Leaders and Commanders  ||
 |{{:orders:grundeswald_corp.png?22|}}Greenkitten  | {{http://i.imgur.com/ieyyjw8.png?22}}[[people:k_chris|Killer Chris]] |
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 </WRAP>
-Grundescorp v. Chris, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the [[orders:order_of_the_staff|Oceania States Supreme Court]] on the issue of harassment. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, [[orders:grundeswald#former_locations|Grundescorp v. Shakomatic]], the Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14.88th Amendment extended to a company's decision to undertake a project, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating these projects: protecting international interests and protecting the company's image. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a project, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of projects to the company's work schedule.
+Grundescorp v. Chris, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the [[orders_and_guilds:orders:order_of_the_staff|Oceania States Supreme Court]] on the issue of harassment. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, [[orders_and_guilds:orders:grundeswald#former_locations|Grundescorp v. Shakomatic]], the Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14.88th Amendment extended to a company's decision to undertake a project, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating these projects: protecting international interests and protecting the company's image. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a project, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of projects to the company's work schedule.
 ====== Background ======
@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 ====== The Verdict ======
-Harassing the [[orders:order_of_the_staff|The Order of the Staff]] for compensation and justice. [[people:tangaloa|Tangaloa]] mysteriously disappeared, forcing [[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr]] to come online. After determining that Chris was wasting the staff's time his house was restored and [[memes:mod_abuse|Chris was temporarily banned]].
+Harassing the [[orders_and_guilds:orders:order_of_the_staff|The Order of the Staff]] for compensation and justice. [[people:tangaloa|Tangaloa]] [[memes:mod_abuse|mysteriously disappeared]], forcing [[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr]] to come online. After determining that Chris was wasting the staff's time his house was restored and [[memes:mod_abuse|Chris was temporarily banned]].