>Build bombard towers in ally town
>Set stance to enemy.
>? ? ? ? ?
>PROFIT!!

 --- //[[people:juinn|Juinn]] 2013/09/21 06:03//

I vote no --- //[[sikandarmc@gmail.com|Sikandar]] 2013/04/04 06:03//

No.  --- //[[hinorashi@gmail.com|hino]] 2013/04/04 06:04//

I don.t grief other peoples proposals, I expect the same respect back.

Perhaps the settlement should have to pay reparations in material + time cost translated to materials if they don't want their buildings removed. --- //[[sikandarmc@gmail.com|Sikandar]] 2013/04/04 07:17//

I think people should simply just not build in a place where they will want to take something down. I am very much for a "tough shit" policy when it comes to this. I would say if a player wished to relinquish control of a building within a settlement, the settlement should be obligated to pay the player in some way though. I dont htink that the building should be used as a form of extortion though, it further limits a nation/settlements power over its own territory.

Generally the idea of the rules at play is that a nation shouldn't get in the way of players or settlements though, nations are not the favored group, but this is irrelevant as it should be framed more as settlements vs individuals, but then it is really just founders of settlements vs other players. --- //[[sikandarmc@gmail.com|Sikandar]] 2013/04/04 07:17//